44
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 18 hours ago

I haven't really seen the case being made here that the category art is useful beyond being a tool of oppression.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 18 hours ago

we have to validate non-art things to break them from seeking the label as validation.

elegant game rules or an ikea table or a video poker machine not being art doesn't diminish the worth of those things, and convincing someone those things are art doesn't elevate their worth.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 3 points 17 hours ago

The designers of IKEA furniture are often pretty highly regarded. The furniture itself is like a postcard you buy from the museum gift shop.

Game rules are an interesting case because copyright protection for game mechanics is very limited. And it would be absolutely disastrous for the industry if there was strong IP protection for IP rules. This comes from ideas not being copyrightable.

Of course IP is not the same as art but I think there is enough of an overlap in how bourgeois society decides what is art and what is original work.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
44 points (97.8% liked)

Games

21239 readers
424 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS