45
submitted 2 months ago by monica_b1998@lemmy.world to c/linux@sopuli.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] exaybachae@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

Let the community vote. Get them onboarded and functioning now. If they don't work out, try another.

[-] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I think the voting thing is a terrible idea

Greg KH will probably take over

[-] big_dog_lemmy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

Perhaps a ranked voting system? Succession methodologies rarely work any better, and lead to all kinds of nepotism.

[-] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We need nepotism in the Kernel, whomever takes over needs to be a long time developer with skills.

Elections are great for steering committees and such it not for a huge highly technical piece of software that powers the world

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I agree. The democratization is already there, it's called forking.

[-] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

This might be one of the few cases where democracy won't actually work very well. If for no other reason than that I don't think we can actually define the community in any useful way.

Technocracy/meritocracy in this case is better, so long as disaffected groups can fork the kernel rather than be forced to accept what that leadership decides (they can).

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)

Linux

4340 readers
1 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS