270
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
270 points (96.9% liked)
politics
19144 readers
1836 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Frankly they both just need to listen to FEMA and other agencies to know how bad it is, what is needed for funding, etc.
The whole "visit the scene" thing is theater.
A Leader needs to be seen to care for the People being led to have the faith to rebuild. Soulless bureaucrats in far away place to do not instill such faith.
I don't buy that. It's mostly to stop the opposition from saying "look the president doesn't care about you".
There is much History (see any Historic account of a Leader rallying his People, as per Joan D'arc, or for a more recent example see Present day Ukraine) to back up my view and yours assumes bad faith which must first be proven.
Whenever a president fails to visit a disaster site in a timely manner the opposition goes nuts over it. Yet nobody expects the president to lead us into battle. They can but don't - because the opposition doesn't want to either. So they both stay silent about it.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/08/16/editorial-biden-too-slow-on-the-draw-over-maui-disaster/
"He didn't get there fast enough" is a common criticism. And almost all of the criticism comes from the opposition. It's political now.
Myopia which ignores the examples given is hardly a refute.
It's that a confession?
I seriously doubt you are qualified to hear one.
I'll take that as a compliment.
Yes, the are sadly some that take great pleasure in bad faith arguments. Well done.
Other agencies likely, but FEMA doesn't have a spotless record
No agency, person, organization, etc anywhere ever has a "spotless record".
I used to know a FEMA worker and he claimed that the tinfoil hat crowd reaches out to them about once a week on average.
Over-the-shoulder photo looking out of a helicopter.
"Hmm, yes, okay, I see now what you meant by disaster. Thank you for showing me."
Oh Biden isn't listening to FEMA? Can you link me to an example of that?
Tha fuck you talking about?
They're asking you why you felt the need to "both sides" this as if Biden and desantis aren't listening to experts/playing politics, while Biden is doing everything correctly. It's disingenuous to act like the one person who is doing the right thing also needs to work on doing better, while the other is actively making it worse and trying to blame everyone but himself.
I didn't say anything like what you think I said. Take a breath, stop being a partisan hack, and read it again.
IDK man it wasn't clear and I asked you a question. The way you reacted tho is fucking telling tho lol
Telling of what? You've misunderstood everything else. I'd be surprised if you got anything right
I didn't "both sides" anything. Only a partisan hack would see it that way.