201

If so, was it polled somewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Which genocide is being denied by hexbear users?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I had some conversations here. They were saying that China isn't doing anything to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang. That seems like genocide denial to me.

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why are you linking an actual propaganda thinktank as an example as of Uyghur Genocide?

You could link any source, but you link one that is staffed by people who's careers have been purely to lie about American's enemies and push American interests?? I hope you're a little sharper than that and you're just linking that because you hope other people will swallow anything.

"HEY GUYS THIS ORGANIZATION THAT IS PAID TO TELL ME THAT CHINA IS BAD, GET THIS, SAYS CHINA IS BAD!!"

Come on bud.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Wikipedia? Unironically? You must be trolling

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It isn't the government, and the sources cited within are very good. Would you only accept China or Russia's word for it? Or are western sources okay?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The sources cited are in large part Adrian Zenz and articles citing zenz. Radio free Asia shows up as well. How are these good sources?
Not to mention that Wikipedia is known to have a huge right wing bias and a well-known Nazi problem

I don't trust Chinese or Russian media either, I employ a healthy level of scepticism towards any media.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is there any way I can convince you China is sterilizing and reeducating massive numbers of people in interment camps against their will? It seems like you've just said everything is untrustworthy.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Yes. If you can interact with and debunk the sources I've provided you and if you can provide first-hand sources such as official government papers detailing the CPCs sterilisation plans for Uyghur women, detailing how they plan to forcibly sterilize Uyghur women in order to eradicate their population.
This would be comical, since the Uyghurs are one of the fastest growing populations in china. So somehow they would both be performing sterilisations and still having the population grow. Someone must've messed up.

Now is there any way I can convince you to interact with the sources provided.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

China is sterilizing

I want you to think critically about this one. What people point to is an uptick in IUD insertions.

We have seen what sterilization compaigns in other countries look like, such as forced hysterectomies in the US and chemical castration in Israel. IUDs are birth control, they don't sterilize the patient. An appropriately-trained doctor can safely remove one in just a few minutes and I don't think you even need equipment to do so!

Literally even if we were imagining China was forcing women to get IUDs, which it isn't, that's not sterilizing them! Those women would not be sterilized!

But this is part of the endless layers of warping and misrepresentation that make things go from "uptick in IUD insertions"

to Zenz exaggerating the rate by a literal order of magnitude

to hack journalists doing circular citations of Associated Press, etc. making sinister insinuations

to people who don't follow this very closely saying "sterilizing"

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

So temporarily sterilisation? The important question would be whether it is forced.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Oh, I agree that in a vacuum that would be the more important thing, but I forgot to return to my first point: Given that this would be an extraordinarily poor way of doing forced sterilization and we know that from the many campaigns that we have decent documentation of, in the absence of solid evidence, concluding that this was "a forced sterilization campaign" does not seem reasonable. Like, in terms of everything from resilience to material waste, even just doing tube tyings (which effectively result in genuine sterilization in 1/4 of cases) would be much more effective. It's like saying they are trying to kill Uyghurs by promoting juggling in the hopes that they will bonk themselves in the head and stumble into traffic, it just isn't what such campaigns have ever looked like in practice.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

While I think nay accusation of genocide should be taken seriously and investigated, I do not think we should accept these claims without basis, and we have to accept that despite several years of allegations, no proof has been provided. Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang. Here's a carrd with mainly Western sources debunking the claims of genocide https://xinjiangahr.carrd.co/

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Both the US state department and the CIA have had to acknowledge that there is no genocide going on in Xinjiang

That's very misleading. They say they have insufficient proof to say it is racially motivated. (Which is a prerequisite for genocide) But there is certainly great oppression happening there.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Both organisations have acknowledged that there is at the worst a cultural genocide going on - ie. An erasure of culture.
One can wonder how such a genocide is carried out, when the Uyghur language is still taught, Uyghur culture and language is still freely distributed and promoted and Uyghur people are a prominent part of the Chinese popular culture.
Your claim leads me to believe you did not engage with the sources provided to you.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Forced sterilisation (birth rates are down 60% vs about 10% for the rest of China) and forceful reeducation? They don't care about the language as much as the shared cultural identity separate from China.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Did you even look at the carrd? If you're not gonna engage with the sources, then it's pretty clear you're not arguing in goog faith and there's no reason for this discussion to continue

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] RedDawn@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Birth rates were already much lower in the rest of China, did the Han do a genocide on themselves first lol or is declining birth rate the norm in a country with massively improved economic conditions and development, and has that begun to affect the more rural regions of China?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

That's why I clarified that there was a approx. 10% across the county vs a 60% decrease in that area.

[-] RedDawn@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

No, that isn’t a clarification. You’re not understanding that the birth rates in the rest of China were already much lower prior to the 10% decrease. The Uighur population has been growing even as the Han population has leveled out, because the Han already had lower birth rates for decades. The Uighur were exempted from the one child policy as well. So yeah, the rest decreased 10%, there was less room to decrease in the first place because birth rates were already very low!

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Why would the CPC, in the same breath, exempt the Uyghurs from the One Child Policy but also force sterilization?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Venus@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago

Denounce the US genocide against Martians right now or you're a genocide denier.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

Hell yeah I'm a genocide denier.

I deny white genocide without any remorse 😎

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
201 points (89.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8206 readers
11 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS