[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Here's a lil' secret for ya: Affecting change requires you to apply continued pressure. Only when single voices become a chorus will the powerful listen. So yes, Greta is saying what ~~we all~~ you already knew. But that's a good thing. The more say it, the bigger the pressure.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

Don't say the big R-word or they'll remove your post. That'd be POLITICS! Even if it is directly related to what you're talking about.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

I think he was talking about big scary Pootin, threatening for the undecillionth time to push the big scary red button. Don't think about Pootin being to scared to even call for a mobilization, just ignore that he'd rather throw north koreans into the meat grinder than his own voter base, because he's scared of them. Just ignore that. Focus on that big red scary button. WW3 around the corner!

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

"You are undermining ~~men controlling their wives~~ family values!"

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

It certainly looks that way.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 155 points 2 days ago

Counter argument: The maintainers could "easily" relocate to a country that is not currently conducting an invasion to enlarge its territory.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

You could always use lemmy.org

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

Is the megathread outdated? It has entries that both don't work anymore and were already removed in earlier versions.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 189 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In Germany, vacation days expire as well (past a certain amount), but the employer is forced by law to force you to take your vacation days.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 186 points 4 months ago

On the one hand, yeah. Worrying about stuff that you have barely any control over won't get you far. But on the other hand, that guy's vote counts as much as yours. And if he already believes such silly conspiracy theories as the flat earth theory, he will be easily swayed by whoever is the loudest contrarian.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 228 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think the real upsetting thing isn't Biden's performance, or having Biden as president for four more years. He achieved quite a bit after all. The real upsetting thing is the DNC being such cunts that they even pushed for this debate, hoping that Biden could win, only to deny and ignore Biden's abhorrent performance immediately after. That Bernie got shafted twice by them, that is the really upsetting part.

29
74

After having spent some time on Lemmy and learning of the intricacies of the different Lemmy instances, I think the landing page for the Lemmyverse could do with some streamlining. I remember that back when I joined, the only information I used to decide on an instance to join was the user count, the signup policy and the instance name. Now, coming from the instance with the best name, I can't say that I've regretted my choice, but for new people looking to join Lemmy, crucial information that would help them join the instance best suited for them is still missing.

To provide that information, I want to suggest the creation of multiple categories, in which instance owners are encouraged to describe their instance. Instances that provide a description for each category are then ranked higher on the join-lemmy.org website.

The following categories would, in my opinion, help new users decide on an instance to join:

Content Policy
This category could describe what kind of content the instance wants to specialize in. Whether that be sports, games, specific sports teams or games, NSFW content, meme content, etc.

Signup Policy
The website already shows whether an application needs to be filled out, but it doesn't show what is expected of the applicant. A category describing what exactly the instance would like to see in their new users would help those users decide, if that instance is for them or not.
As an example, an instance focussed on a certain language could inform users, that they expect an application in that language.

Community creation Policy
Here, instances could describe what rules they have around community creation. Small instances could, for example, clarify in this category, that they would only want to host niche communities without much traction at most. Other servers could specify that they would only want to host unique communities, not copies of or communities closely related to communities already existing on other instances.

Federation Policy
Here instance owners could clarify their stance on what other instances they are willing or not willing to federate with. To give an example, instances could describe their stance on federating with other instances hosting NSFW content, possibly illegal content (lemmy.world and /c/piracy), overly political content, and so on and so forth.

Lastly, some statistics could be added to show the health of the instance: Active user to inactive user ratio, active user to report ratio, active user/report to mod action ratio, community engagement ratio, uptime, server software version and so on.

With these categories, I can say that if I were to join the Lemmyverse today, I'd be able to make a much more informed decision on what instance to join.

7
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works to c/rimworld@lemmy.world

I'd like to use a mod that allows me to create crafting bills that only trigger when I have more than X resources in storage. As an example, if I set up a bill that requires 4 Components, I'd like to set a limit of 50 Components, so that items only get crafted, if I have more than 50 Components in storage. Does anyone know of a mod that allows this constraint to be set?

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works to c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Too good not to share.

A user laments that apart from this post, a statement made by pacifists in the year 2020, nobody outside russia calls Ukraine a military dictatorship.

How could that be, I wonder.

13

Whenever I try to respond to Mastodon comments with this account, I only get an endlessly spinning loading circle. From my lemmy.world backup account however I can send the response no problem. Any clue why that is?

9
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

This question was asked already, but sadly not answered. Lemmy instances all support the path /instances, so sh.itjust.works/instances would show you all the instances my home instance is (de)federated with for example. Is there something similar for kbin?

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

I've installed Fennec on my Android 12 device, since it still has about:config accessible. I've been following this old guide from 2014 in order to set a custom download path, however unfortunately without luck. Is it still possible to set the download folder and if it is, what options do I need to set?

I found browser.download.useDownloadDir and have set it to false. I've tried to set browser.download.dir to /storage/C05C-A00E/Test, which is what my file explorer app tells me my sdcard is mounted under, and to /sdcard/Test, which is what the tutorial showed. Both did not work, downloads still land in the default download folder.

1

I think the way federation currently works spells doom for the fediverse, should any service of it get major traction. Currently, if you subscribe to a community on Lemmy or follow a user on Mastodon, your instance will pull the content of that instance/user and make it available for all to see and interact with. What seems like a good idea to spread content however is becomming the achilles heel of the fediverse: The admins of Lemmy/Mastodon instances are liable in many juristictions for the content their servers are distributing. This means in practice that many Lemmy/Mastodon instances block NSFW content for example, as the admins, understandably so, are either unwilling or incapable of making sure they are not running afoul of any laws.

As such, I think that the fediverse needs to offer a way for users to follow content from other instances without having that content be stored, let alone shared by their home instances.

A question I have at this point is where this criticism is best levied against. Is it the job of Lemmy/Mastodon to provide such a form of federation, or does the ActivityPub protocol needs to be ammended?

view more: next ›

Quacksalber

joined 1 year ago