78
submitted 3 months ago by Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mika@piefed.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Woman definitely can serve and general training for everyone is not a bad idea so that people could try and understand if they like it.

But as far as the real war goes, you won't mobilise womans unless they have very specific skills (medics, mostly), cause someone needs to take care of the children.

Gender equality isn't a top priority during the war, I guess.

[-] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

someone needs to take care of the children

This is what fathers do as well

[-] Mika@piefed.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Not if they are mobilised too.

[-] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

You've kinda fucked yourself over if all the parents are away shooting other people

[-] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

When it comes to mobilisation, we are talking about nonvoluntary service. The mobilisation rules need to be simple and easily enforced. So yeah, the simplest way to avoid both parents to be forcefully mobilised is to do this on men only, and add a clause about a single parent in case mother died or is in service.

Otherwise I can't see how it isn't gonna be a mess.

[-] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Lol, you really are woooshed about gender equality?

[-] Mika@piefed.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Explain your point

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2180 readers
687 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS