5
Run browser and/or mpv directly on hardware?
(programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
5 points (77.8% liked)
Linux
63547 readers
238 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
There is no hard definition within the laws so this is all speculation. This means that there is no technical answer because the question in is core is a legal one.
Your TV for example can have a browser without problems.
You can have an integrated board that runs a full Linux without you being able to touch the underlying OS and let that start a browser, too. You know those tv screens that show you traffic into it flight plans at the airport? Those are often full Linux computers set up exactly like that.
In short: we'll only know when the law is actually being tested. It's written in a way that I as layman could talk and software and even most hardware into it's definition, it's absolute bullshit...
Most TVs are probably already compliant because using them requires creating a Google or Apple account, which already want your age information (and the California bill explicitly allows using existing data like this IIRC). That's good for avoiding disruption, but not so good from a privacy perspective.
Right. Would you say then, that trying to preemptively circumvent a yet untested law is a waste of resources and time? As in, it's better to wait and see how authorities and courts will handle and implement the law?
For users yes - for developers, as much as it saddens me, no.
Ubuntu for example started the discussion about what they need to do to show their the demanded effort was being put into.
It's the devs that are put at risk here - and I dare say by design. If this just correlates or is caused by the support from the big OS corporations one can only speculate. My speculation is: at the very least strongly influenced.