27
Is there an estimate of the carbon footprint of Trump's war?
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
53463 readers
405 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think a war has bigger footprint than all the backrolled environmental protection laws, and pushing coal and big oil does...
Because those effects will be felt over the - naively hopeful wishful thinking of those wars being over in the close future. Right?
Pushing up the price of oil and stopping production could actually be carbon negative.
Maybe the fastest way to stop this war is to note that there are positive environmental outcomes.