78
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Approximate location, price and date?

Edit: report back in a week any change if you remember.

E2: went up 9¢ since I posted this morning. $3.19 now.

E3: $3.30 now. ~20¢ in a day, 50¢ in 4 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

we slowed them down by using super high tariffs on electric vehicles and solar panels and it makes sense from a geopolitical perspective. the united states & europe uses its economic leverage to control the world and letting people buy chinese electric vehicles, solar panels, etc. would give the chinese this same type of leverage.

trump, biden, obama, both bushes, etc. consider china to be the enemy, so forcing people to stay dependent on fossil fuels instead of green energy is a way of making sure that the united states stays in control; the same is true for europe.

that's also why we regime changed venezuela, libya, iran, etc. because they started selling oil using other currencies besides the american dollar and that would make the united states lose some of this leverage too.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

But that's what im saying -- high tarrifs doesn't skow down technological innovation in China, of course they're way ahead of us now on EV technology. Yes, they did it to keep power over their United Statesian subjects, by keeping us in the dark they have more power over us. China didn't slow down at all because of that.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. So it wasn't that they ignored navigating, it was that their hegemony took priority.

I guess my point is they used to have a lot more power in China than they do now. It didn't have to be this way, the oil billionaires and automobile CEO could have found a way to monopolize renewables and EV technology at home too. They just operated off of fear and laziness instead of bravery and industriousness.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm glad they didn't; the morally bankrupt and depraved lengths to which American capitalists will go to for profit is slowly killing this world and they're in full knowledge that fact.

They can afford the finest taught money can buy and I bet that China's primacy had little impact on their plans. I also bet that's why they opted to delay instead of deny China.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
78 points (97.6% liked)

Asklemmy

53482 readers
223 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS