105
Polymarket Decides Incentivizing a Nuclear Detonation Might Be a Bad Idea (gizmodo.com)
submitted 6 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Elysia@hexbear.net 60 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Murphy warned that allowing these wagers to go on could create incentives for people in the Situation Room to think about how they could profit from military decisions instead of focusing on national security.

Can't incentivize winning the big upset "no US war crimes for a day" bet

[-] spudnik@hexbear.net 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

anakin-padme-4 So that means they'll be removing all the other bets that offer a perverse incentive for our leaders to abuse their positions of power for their own gain?

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
105 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14305 readers
604 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net