70

In theory of course. And please refrain from telling me why a global revolution would not work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 day ago

It would require several simultaneous grass roots movements globally rising up, or the complete collapse of the global economy.

Trump's on his way to obliterating the petrodollar ...

[-] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago

So how would you get those going?

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

Well, you could launch a war with Iran, for one. That's looking like a good way to destroy the global economy.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

we're doing it already, climate change

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The global economical system with its built in assumption of infinite growth is on a collision course with the material realities of the world. So it will either change drastically, or collapse. The latter seems much more likely.

I think cracks will form and new, more local, decentralized and equitable frameworks will sprout from those cracks as people help each other, because the system can't or wont help them.

[-] Temperche@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Find a common goal that catches peoples interest and is widely agreeable/acceptable but goes against current politics.

[-] murmelade@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Castrating people in the Epstein files?

[-] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

That is an excellent question.

[-] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com -4 points 1 day ago

I am eager to hear your excellent answer. No thought about a better world is a wasted one, gimme gimme.

[-] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am neither capable of creating international uprisings or the destruction of the machine of capitalism. I don't know why you would expect me to.

[-] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

But you are capable of thinking about it. That's all we are doing here.

[-] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Why don't you start by an example?

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Many organizations with loose leadership but all with common goals.

That way taking out a leader or even cluster of the movement won't stop it but just fuel increased determination of the others.

At least that's what I heard is one way that one side can win against enemies with more tech , weapons, and troops than they.

Also. Let's not downplay guerilla tactics.

They have always been effective against a bigger enemy.

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
70 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

53578 readers
902 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS