647
... (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I thought the indians did teach colonists how to grow crops like corn and often shared food with them. But then large amounts of Indians would die from a plague every time the colonists visited (disease moment), and then they became suspicious that they were purposefully killing them. And then the colonists grew suspicious that the Indians were planning on killing them and then they all killed each other. Except the colonists had guns and so they won.

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LMAO,

No, the settlers had always have genocide in their mind because they craved the "free real state" and slaves that comes with massacring societies.

Again: The Crusades stopped when Europe discovered America and so had an easier place were to do expansion/ocuppation/imperialism

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

Did they ever tell you that the very first ship to travel back from America to Europe had enslaved natives on it?

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

indians

first of all, start using native american, indian is a racist term made up by silly people who somehow mistook cuba for the indian subcontinent.

The colonists thought the natives subhuman and then began routinely exterminating them

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

Even if they deemed them humans, they wanted the land.

The crusades stopped when Europe discovered America and had a way easier place to do their plunder and expansion/colonization

[-] MultigrainCerealista@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it’s ok to keep using the term Indian because many within the Native American community have indicated a preference for it.

Also “Native American” is a kind of sterile word made up in the 1970s by coastal libs and so some within the Native American community feel it’s too clinical and empty of meaning.

It’s true that Indian is colonial and hilariously inaccurate but it’s been used for centuries and so becomes imbued with meaning and identity through so much use.

Ideally you use the specific tribal name since they aren’t a single people, like it’s a false category since it isn’t a singular identity anyway except for being defined in contrast to non-indigenous Americans. So where possible avoid the collective noun anyway but when the collective noun is required then the general consensus within the Native American community is that either “Indian” or “Native American” is acceptable, with some taking strong exception to “Indian” due to it being inaccurate but also many equally taking exception to “Native American” for being clinically dehumanizing and equally imposed by white colonizers.

I think the best is to defer to the preference of current company but the idea that the term “Indian” at least has been imbued with a strong cultural identity makes sense to me.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

hey look, its the thing this post is about in action!

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

The natives were chill and their help was the only reason the settlers survived in a lot of cases, but uhh... the same could not be said the other way around.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
647 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
929 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS