200
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
200 points (90.3% liked)
Privacy
47356 readers
669 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Let's not pretend the hypervisor doesn't have full access to the VMs memory and execution. The only thing protecting the Signal server is Intel SGX.
I don't think Signal trusts the AWS server either, that's the point of E2EE encryption.
I'm not claiming the contents of the messages are at risk here. You're social graph and metadata though is another story.
The only data they store are account creation time and last connection time.
https://signal.org/bigbrother/district-of-columbia/
Well no, they store more data than this. They store your contacts as well, that's how they can do contact discovery. There's a hashing and linked list mechanism for it. It's better now. But it used to be a simple hash, something for which you could build a rainbow table in a few hours, at the worst.
It also.foesnt really matter if the software itself can easily be tampered with in memory by the hypervisor. Like I said, they are putting a lot of trust in Intel SGX. And thus the data doesn't need to be stored for issues to arise.
https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/
... Providing you trust Intel SGX.
😃
conspiracy begins...
What conspiracy? CPU bugs aren't a conspiracy, they are just a fact. Amazon's involvement with American three letter agencies isn't a conspiracy, it's a fact.
Yea but if you worry about CPU bugs there is no such thing as trust, no matter who owns the infrastructure. Any software can have critical bugs and any system that can be accessed remotely can be compromised. Personally I'd trust the people at Signal that they have made a reasonable architecture section to balance availability and privacy
I don't take anything from someone I don't trust that also explicitly doesn't use warrant canaries because he says they don't work in contradiction to every legal authority.
It's also an issue that they run the signal server on one single AWS region.
It isn't hard or even all that expensive to run on multiple regions.
It's not me you need to tell this though.