54
Mark Carney's attacks on Canada's public service should concern all Canadians
(noraloreto.substack.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Are there any country that have uncapped their money printing, and does it require capital controls to stop people from fleeing the currency to avoid financial repression, leading to a large inflation in the FX market?
While no country officially calls it uncapped money printing, both China and Vietnam operate systems of massive state directed credit creation as an alternative to capitalist monetary policy. Instead of relying on private banks to originate loans for stock buybacks or real estate speculation they use publicly owned banking sectors to directly fund state owned enterprises and massive infrastructure projects. They are effectively using currency issuance as a tool for allocating real material resources and labor.
Their approach relies heavily on what Western economists complain about as financial repression. Keeping interest rates low allows the state to guarantee cheap credit for massive development projects that benefit the broader society. If the capital account were fully open the domestic elite and foreign investors would immediately move their wealth offshore seeking higher parasitic yields in Western financial markets. Such a massive capital flight would trigger the scenario you described where everyone dumps the local currency causing it to plummet in the foreign exchange market leading to imported inflation that crushes the working class.
China and Vietnam learned from the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis when countries with open capital accounts were completely destroyed by Western speculative attacks. Strictly controlling the flow of capital across their borders forces domestic wealth to remain inside the country where it can be put to productive use rather than fleeing to Wall Street casinos. That's the mechanism that allows them to maintain sovereign control over their macroeconomic policy and prioritize long term industrial development over the short term profit demands of international speculators. Basically, you cannot have a stable currency independent monetary policy and free capital flows all at the same time. So, a socialist oriented state must sacrifice the free movement of capital to protect its economic sovereignty.
This comment makes no economic sense, very much as the linked article.
I am not the mod here, but I would very much welcome if Substack would be banned. Not everything there is necessarily bad, but most articles are imo.
That's an amazing counterpoint Scotty. If you don't like it here, feel free to go back to reddit where you can enjoy spending time with your fellow trolls.
I have never been there, but I understand why Reddit eventually banned the tankie community.
Again, sound like a perfect place for dronies like you. Clearly you're not able to mentally cope with people having different views from your own, and you need a safe space. This ain't it.
Oh and for people wondering, this is one of a handful of bot accounts that spam on here incessantly https://lemmy.ml/post/39655060
A wumao accuses others of being unable to cope with different views.
You are spreading authoritarian pro-China, anti-Canada propaganda exclusively, while trying to insult everyone with an opposing opinion (and this isn't not the worst you're doing). Your comments are, again, ridiculous.
I'm perfectly capable of coping with different views. I'm not the one screeching about banning posts from sources I don't like here and trying to limit discussion. That's all you bud. If you don't like what I'm posing, you can keep malding about it. Really warms my heart that I get a rise out of racists like you. Clearly I'm doing something right.