202
i've just seen a comment in a post, in this very community, saying people trust signal because of missinformation (from what i could undertand).
if this is true, then i have a few questions:
-what menssaging app should i use for secure communications? i need an app that balances simplicity and security.
-how to explain it to my friends who use signal because i recomended?
-what this means for other apps in general?
What's the one mistake? Telegram? Or Signal?
The way I see it, the goalposts keep moving because Telegram was the private alternative to FB Messenger and WhatsApp. Then Signal was the private alternative to those, and Telegram. Now people are saying Signal is a problem (I'm guessing because of the cock up the US government had last year?). The goalposts keep moving, but Telegram is still fine for what I need. I keep both as alternatives to texting for people who want to reach me however they're comfortable doing. I also have one called Session. I don't use Twitter/X, Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp, or Reddit. I have a Discord because I have a couple things that are only available up there, but it's not a good way to reach me as I have notifications disabled on it.
Telegram never was the private alternative to anything, unless you took their advertisement at face value. It was always known to not use e2ee by default.
Signal is not a problem, the US gov things were very dumb users issues. It was not caused by Signal itself.
So the goalpost has not moved in years, Signal was and is still good, Telegram is only fine if you do not care about privacy.