646
Defediverse (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by w00t@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago

Tankies aren't real Communists

Sucking the dick of authoritarian regimes does not make you communist

[-] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Heaven forbid an actually existing place on the planet actually make some real tangible gains for its people while necessarily suppressing threats

[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

There's "threats" and there's "anyone remotely criticising the regime"

There are some tangible gains in these places but also significant losses for the freedoms and rights of their residents

[-] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

They don't/didn't suppress criticism, that's a myth

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Hell yeah there's that lib homophobia, 1 milimeter below the surface at all times

[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I'm bi but no go ahead, call me a homophobe for making a dick joke :p

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then you should know better than to be homophobic as a substitute for saying anything interesting. Self-reflection would probably help you to not embarass yourself in the future.

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Why does it always go to homophobia with these types

[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Idk where the homophobia is, I'm partial to sucking the odd dick myself, just not Mao Zedong or Vladimir Putin :p

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

"umm actually I used it as an insult because it's a good thing!"

How do you people survive the cognitive dissonance necessary to convince yourself you're not being bigoted?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Real Communism exists only in the pure and untouched ethereal plane of your mind palace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

I support whatever this is so idk what that makes me

[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Celebrating an increase in life expectancy from 30 to 40 years old is not remotely the win you think it is.

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm celebrating the increase in life expectancy from 35 to higher than that of the US, actually, which is the win I think it is.

The point is not the immediate increase in that specific 5 year period, the point is the clear trend of rapid, long term increases after a long period of stagnation, with the pivitol turning point being exactly when the CPC came to power. You're supposed to look at the whole graph.

load more comments (49 replies)
[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My god he can't read a graph. How has our educational system been allowed to fail for this long?

I'm not committed at all to China as the salvation of the communist project, but it's exactly this sort of self-imposed illiteracy and ignorance, and nearly religious faith in the inferiority and duplicity of The Orient that makes me default to distrusting anything negative a cracker says about it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] randint@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Careful calling those regimes authoritarian. Hexbears like to attack this point by assigning a slightly different definition to authoritarian and then either (a) claim that all governments are "authoritarian" or (b) blame liberals for using this word to demonize socialist states. I once saw someone cite https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Authoritarianism to "prove" that those states are not authoritarian.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Not by "assigning a slightly different definition", just by applying the definition consistently, rather than using the us-foreign-policy standard.

Ah yes, doge-firefox, please tell me how consistent your beliefs are lmao

[-] mustardman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Did you just ad hominimem this poor LIB ?

I strawmanned ad hominined logical fallacied all over them.

[-] ScrivenerX@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's worse than just that. They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

They are so scared and insecure they will lash out against anything that slightly challenges their beliefs. If they post sources it will be misreadings of fringe groups, or conveniently ignoring facts. Like how they believe tiananmen square wasn't a big deal because the China killed about 300 people a mile away. Or how Cuba is a utopia even though it's citizens chose to get run over by the coast guard instead of living there.

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

No, we argue that equating the bad things the soviet union did to the holocaust is holocaust trivialization, which is a take from mainstream liberal historians. Because the bad things the soviet union did were tiny compared to the holocaust and pretty tame compared to the other Allies.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As ever, actual Jewish Holocaust scholars agree with us

https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
646 points (70.4% liked)

Memes

45185 readers
1471 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS