9

The wind cuts across an empty stretch of land on the southern edge of London, Ont., where rows of small, cabin-like units sit far from bus routes, shops and the downtown core.

For Tim Magee, who spent years living in a tent in the woods, the move there was supposed to be a step forward. Instead, he says, it feels like being pushed further out.

“I’ll go back to the streets or back to the bush somewhere,” Magee said. “I’ll be more comfortable out there than here.”

Magee said he plans to leave the site, citing isolation, strict rules and the cost of staying there.

“Poverty and homelessness are constantly having rules imposed on them — how they can access things, when they can access them and in what way. In combination with isolation, that can feel too burdensome for day-to-day living.”

Magee said much of that frustration stems from the site’s location on the outskirts of the city, far from transit, services and daily amenities.

“My cheque went from $1,400 down to $466 … I can’t justify that,” he said. “Where is all this money going? I’d like to know, but we don’t get answers.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

frustration stems from the site’s location on the outskirts of the city, far from transit, services and daily amenities. ... “My cheque went from $1,400 down to $466 … I can’t justify that,”

Holy fuck that sucks. $115/week would barely cover food and clothing, let alone transit, Internet access, and fun.

No wonder he's upset.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, but he has four walls now, so he's not homeless and can't complain/can be removed from the statistics.

/s, although that's the vibe of how a lot of systems for poor people work, probably because they're designed by rich poiticians.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

They shouldn't be profitable. They should be geared to income.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Per the article, it's money the government gives these people in the first place, so it kinda is.

It does raise the possibility that if the government had just not made it legally impossible to build these things on a normal property, they'd already exist, and probably in a less dumb place.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
9 points (90.9% liked)

Canada

11825 readers
409 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS