-14
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Karl@literature.cafe to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child

Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago

nope but I don't think we should subsidize having kids with tax brakes and such. 100% public education and meals at school and we should have universal healthcare. so if children are born provide for their needs as we do for other members of society but no tax breaks or such.

[-] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

I’d happily pay more taxes for all of those things, absolutely agree.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
-14 points (18.2% liked)

Asklemmy

53850 readers
424 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS