191
submitted 1 day ago by rbits@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Read the whole thread

However, we don't have a "hardened security" approach, we aren't developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Sadly FUD as ANYTHING that is NOT increasing profit for surveillance capitalism, i.e Google, Meta, etc is a win for privacy!

Of course /e/OS could be better, GrapheneOS could also be better (including on security) but the big picture is that still ANY of those solutions is making surveillance capitalism, the loss of privacy for profit and power, less efficient. That's good for all of us who, being on Lemmy or other federated instance, believe we do benefit from having more privacy, or at least not trading it away.

TL;DR: be inclusive, bring others up, don't be exclusive aiming for perfection none of us can attain.

[-] rbits@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Just because something does something good doesn't mean it's immune to criticism.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
191 points (90.0% liked)

Privacy

47764 readers
1064 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS