200
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Iranians celebrating the beginning of the ceasefire under the framework of Iran's 10 Points.


Mere hours before Trump's 8pm Tuesday deadline yesterday, Pakistan's government contacted Iran with a US-written proposal for a two-week ceasefire, explicitly stated to also include Lebanon, during which they would negotiate a permanent end to the war on the basis of Iran's 10 Points. Among other things, these points include 1) maintaining strict control (joint with Oman) over Hormuz, complete with a toll; 2) the end of sanctions on Iran; 3) keeping their enriched uranium; 4) a withdrawal of US forces from the Middle East [stated by the Supreme Leadership Council but not in the 10 Points, so who knows], and 5) some plausible guarantee that Iran would never be attacked again. I've heard rumors that China may have prodded Iran to accept these terms.

In theory, these are relatively confident and maximalist demands. In practice, Iran has already achieved military and economic control over Hormuz and the withdrawal of many US troops and bases from the region, so at least a few of Iran's demands are, to a greater or lesser extent, already achieved, and with little hope for an increasingly exhausted US to undo these achievements short of nukes.

A couple hours after the ceasefire, the Zionist entity began a wave of airstrikes in Lebanon, killing hundreds of civilians, as well as flying drones into Iranian airspace. This was a strange move to make even if you assume - very sensibly - that the US is completely agreement non-capable: why not agree to the ceasefire and simply pretend to negotiate for two weeks while regrouping/repairing what assets you can and then start hitting Iran again?

One theory is that the Zionists are testing to what degree Iran is actually willing to have solidarity with Lebanon and Hezbollah. While the Resistance has been relatively united since October 7th, the formation of separate peaces instead of negotiating terms as a united front has been a major exploitable weakness. Alternatively, it's been proposed that the US didn't even consider using the ceasefire to regroup and deceive Iran, and that Trump merely wanted a way to chicken out of his threat on Iran's electrical grid - the fact that US officials have since stated that Iran's 10 Points were not the same ones they agreed to is a point supporting this, I suppose. If the conflict resumes and Trump does not deliver another 48 hour deadline (and/or makes it something silly like a month from now) then this could be the explanation.

From Iran, I am getting the sense that a lot is happening behind the scenes. Statements from top officials like Araghchi have stated quite plainly that there will be no ceasefire and no negotiations unless the Zionists stop attacking Lebanon, but as of ~24 hours after the ceasefire began, there has been no significant military response from Iran yet. There have apparently been phone calls between Araghchi and numerous regional officials, but it is unknown to what end. All the while, the global economic situation continues to deteriorate. Over the next week or two, the last tankers that left Hormuz before it closed will arrive at their destinations. If the missile exchanges begin once more, then the West, much like most of the rest of the world, will be experiencing all sorts of fuel, energy, food, and product shortages while trying to justify why they broke the ceasefire to kill more Lebanese civilians.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Torenico@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago

I understand you're trying to be funny and all but you should know there are ways to fight back that don't include missiles and fucking drones. But oh well.

Cuba didn't have any missiles or drones to speak of yet they fought back against US Imperialism over and over again.

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 24 points 6 days ago

it feels like a lost cause with the region being so strongly against them. Even Nicaragua is folding by letting the Evangelical activists out. As a region we could do more but no, most want to elevate gusano voices and deride these governments as “dictators” while glazing Bukele, Milei, and the brainless population keeps guzzling the social media poison. I haven’t entirely given up but it can be very testy during times like this.

[-] Jabril@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago

it's a shame you didn't let Venezuela know sooner, I'm sure they would have loved to finally be told what to do to fight back

Cuba is famously doing well due to their ability to fight the US, right? Or are you harkening back to their successes before most people here were born?

It might be disappointing as cinema but in the real world Venezuela would not be able to survive what Iran is going through, choosing the path of diplomacy is the only option they had. Having thousands of dead Venezuelans wouldn't suddenly give them the ability to fight back, it would just make them have even more challenges to overcome than before, while not being able to sell oil and fund their nation.

[-] Torenico@hexbear.net 12 points 6 days ago

Well it's a shame they didn't invest in better diplomats instead of buying advanced fighter jets and the best anti aircraft system of it's time... because if this is the best they could come up with then it's simply embarrassing. Where is their bargaining power?

Thousands poured into the streets the day after and Delcy's main job was to demobilize them. Not even a general strike, nothing, nada. Maybe these people were never too serious about the whole "Váyanse al carajo yanquis de mierda" thing after all. So in the end we went from a leader who openly defied the US and it's leaders and understood war with them was very likely to a lady who thanked the genocide-loving pedophile piece of shit of Donald Trump for "his work" while also talking about a "far-right plot to prevent Venezuela from reaching out to the IMF". Lady, you just thanked them a second ago. Stupid ass incompetent people, they disgraced the dozens of cubans who actually fought FOR THEM.

[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 12 points 6 days ago

because if this is the best they could come up with then it's simply embarrassing. Where is their bargaining power?

They don't have bargaining power because of the material factors that were laid out above.

So in the end we went from a leader who openly defied the US and it's leaders and understood war with them was very likely

The current government is carrying out Maduro's plan. https://orinocotribune.com/the-weight-on-delcy-rodriguez/

Nicolás Maduro himself initiated processes of economic liberalisation years earlier, as a direct survival response to the crushing weight of sanctions. These are Maduro’s policies. The recent legislation liberalising the hydrocarbons sector was entirely developed under, and approved by, Nicolás Maduro.

[-] SickSemper@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

Jesus christ the ignorance is crazy

[-] Torenico@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

I will disengage because this is stupid as fucking hell and it pains me to see this incompetent leadership hijack a promising revolution, but then again I wasn't referencing Maduro but Chávez.

[-] Jabril@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Where is Cuba's bargaining power? Why are people there starving? If I can cut off your entire economy from the world, kill anyone I want, block other people from helping you, where is your bargaining power? Is this a real question?

Thousands poured into the streets the day after and Delcy's main job was to demobilize them. Not even a general strike, nothing, nada.

Oh wait, is your idea to fight the US for Venezuelan workers to shut down their own economy and refuse to work? Very strategic, yes I wonder why Venezuela didn't try shooting themselves in the foot in response to US aggression. Surely the US would see Venezuelans doing a general strike hurting their own government and realize they better drop the sanctions and stop bombing fishing boats and seizing oil.

[-] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 19 points 6 days ago

Cuba didn't have any missiles or drones to speak of yet they fought back against US Imperialism over and over again.

Cuba had the direct support of the Soviet Union. Venezuela has no one.

[-] SickSemper@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

And also, the americans haven't (yet) tried invading cuba. We'll see how that turns out, but I feel like OP is confused about how Cuba has stood up to american pressure

[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, I think people can end up kind of overly hyping up Cuba and completely forgetting that Grenada and Panama happened. The Bay of Pigs failed specifically because the US didn't provide the necessary support - but the empire has demonstrated with those other countries that they are, unfortunately, more than capable of bringing down the hammer on Latin American states that step out of line. And both of those happened while the USSR was still around - although Panama at least was in '89, during the Gorbachev years, but Grenada happened earlier, in '83 during Andropov's tenure, so we can't even blame Gorby for that one, the Soviet presence did nothing to stop the US.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
200 points (100.0% liked)

news

24740 readers
541 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS