I wish to have a discussion about how physical surveillance affects you in your day-to-day life; apart from Flock and (Ring) doorbell cameras (which I believe are pretty established at this point). This in context with your country of residence, and whether in a rural or densely populated area (as ("smart") cities typically "progress" at a faster rate).

I live in a medium-sized village, in a low-density area of The Netherlands. I rarely travel long distances and visit cities, but despite that, I'm increasingly confronted with surveillance infrastructure. Maybe it's because I know too much about it, and I no longer have the option to be unaware of it, but it eats at me on a daily basis.

Most notable is surveillance surrounding highways, especially: the increased density of radar sensors (which, on their own, might not reveal much about individuals; but could reveal one's progression when paired to ALPR data, for instance), "focusflitsers" (a (mobile) array of thermal-imaging cameras: peering through a vehicle's windshield, supposedly patrolling phone-usage during driving, but also featuring an ALPR (which also captures the driver, besides the license plate of course), and may also be used to record speed-indications (to identify "verkeershufters": roughly translating to "traffic jerks")), dedicated (mobile or stationary) ALPR cameras (supposedly only for detecting warranted vehicles or "hits": unless published in the police's "cameraplan"), "trajectcontroles" (average speed monitoring: essentially two sets of ALPRs, calculating the average time between readings), and (now) digital speed cameras (typically at intersections: instead of adapting road design...). But I'm glad I trust my government to only store "hits" and those in violation... /s

Other than that, I've spotted ALPRs (alongside an increasing number of PTZ cameras) at gas stations and above infrastructure (like bridges), but also built within boom gates before parking areas or recycling centers (behind a little square of darkened glass: in the base of the gate); and in, and surrounding retail areas (especially supermarkets) the number of cameras have risen (including the cameras at the self-checkout lanes: staring customers straight in the face; supposedly to discourage theft, but considering the "pay by face" concept, I fear it's in preparation thereof). Buses, structurally driving through my street, also have (exterior) camera side-mirrors, and therefore frequently capture me. And finally the eyesore that is public-facing home-surveillance systems (despite legally not allowed to, but of course not actively being enforced: as the government would shoot itself in the foot if it did).

That was my little rant, please feel free to leave yours below in the comments; I'm somewhat desperate to hear it. I'm especially interested in stories from Denmark: as even my mom (despite of the "I've got nothing to hide" type) noticed "average speed monitoring" cameras all throughout the country, and "speed cameras" being at the entrance of villages (which I believe you aren't allowed to be notified about in navigation programs: which is also insane to me), when she was there on a holiday. Please be very critical of every camera you're confronted with, including those that appear to have been there for your entire life. It's safe to assume every camera (including old "analog" cameras: through encoders) feed back into modern, digital surveillance platforms: which allow the footage to be actively monitored by AI (often to potentially trigger an alert, which an operator could respond to), possibly retained for an extended period of time (especially when considered evidence, it may be stored long-term: on a centralized server and/or cloud storage), and is shared effortlessly over the internet (instead of requiring physical transfer).