About 10% of Argentina's electricity comes from nuclear power plants. But libertarian President Javier Milei wants to privatize the state-owned nuclear energy company.
So Milei appointed a 23-year-old internet libertarian activist, Ezequiel Acuña, to run the state nuclear company.
Acuña has ZERO experience in nuclear energy. He graduated high school in 2020 and started studying political science in college, but dropped out of the program. He never formally studied science, or even management.
Acuña is also being paid a starting salary that is 10 times larger than the average salary in the private sector, which he and Milei worship, as libertarians.
Acuña has never worked in nuclear energy or anything related. His only "qualification" is that he tweets libertarian propaganda in support of Milei. And the Milei regime thinks that is enough.
This is actually existing libertarianism.
https://xcancel.com/BenjaminNorton/status/2047485764423106793
This is also why it's important to have actual competent people in your movement. For us communists too. Because if you do happen to gain control of a country you need actual competent people to run it and if your party is filled with online activists and whatnot instead of legal experts, economists and the likes you will not run anything lmao.
Yeah, I think what you're touching on is basically the difference between expertise and loyalty. A prole revolution does need people who are loyal to the cause in the highest positions of power, but if you base power only on loyalty, you will have a bunch of people who are very loyal about not knowing what to do. You need a healthy intersection of loyalty and expertise, and the further out someone gets from the levers of power, the less strict you can be about loyalty, as long as they're providing expertise. But no matter how close someone is to power, if you only prioritize loyalty, you get nothing more than sycophants.
Pure loyalty focus is the stuff of cults; their main thing is fealty to the leader. "Will you do this thing I order you to do, no matter how ridiculous or horrible it is?" That's pure loyalty focus.
We'll have to live alongside/with the liberals and socdems too either way, can't really kill off an entire country of people just for the 5000 Real Communists to remain governing over each other. The USSR had to reckon with it and so did China (with varying policies and degrees), but what matters is that once you win state power, you can enact law. You can protect the revolution and the DotP, and keep these people in suitable posts where they can't undermine the state. But first you have to win of course.
Okay don't laugh at me because I personally think I should be permanently barred from a decision maker position and I hope someone eliminates me immediately should I ever be in a position of power through some sort of mistake, but at the same time my curiosity is making me wonder who is this aimed at? Because I certainly will not learn about how to run a state, why would I need to know that when I know I won't be doing it?
This is perhaps the most paradoxical aspect of socialism I've personally encountered ever since I've been reading about it. Why do I need to know all this stuff, if at the of the day I'm just supposed to do as I'm told? At the very least I'm certain that not a single person has ever seriously considered anything I've said and I don't blame them because not everyone is fit to be an advisor and yet no organization wants me when I offer them to do the most rudimentary tasks like mopping the floor? There's plenty of advantages of having me as I require no compensation for my labor, but that's not good enough either it seems.
In a way this is very good tho' because it means there must be plenty of eager recruits. So things should be going well enough.