We'll have to live alongside/with the liberals and socdems too either way, can't really kill off an entire country of people just for the 5000 Real Communists to remain governing over each other. The USSR had to reckon with it and so did China (with varying policies and degrees), but what matters is that once you win state power, you can enact law. You can protect the revolution and the DotP, and keep these people in suitable posts where they can't undermine the state. But first you have to win of course.

Yeah, I think what you're touching on is basically the difference between expertise and loyalty. A prole revolution does need people who are loyal to the cause in the highest positions of power, but if you base power only on loyalty, you will have a bunch of people who are very loyal about not knowing what to do. You need a healthy intersection of loyalty and expertise, and the further out someone gets from the levers of power, the less strict you can be about loyalty, as long as they're providing expertise. But no matter how close someone is to power, if you only prioritize loyalty, you get nothing more than sycophants.

Pure loyalty focus is the stuff of cults; their main thing is fealty to the leader. "Will you do this thing I order you to do, no matter how ridiculous or horrible it is?" That's pure loyalty focus.

Okay don't laugh at me because I personally think I should be permanently barred from a decision maker position and I hope someone eliminates me immediately should I ever be in a position of power through some sort of mistake, but at the same time my curiosity is making me wonder who is this aimed at? Because I certainly will not learn about how to run a state, why would I need to know that when I know I won't be doing it?

This is perhaps the most paradoxical aspect of socialism I've personally encountered ever since I've been reading about it. Why do I need to know all this stuff, if at the of the day I'm just supposed to do as I'm told? At the very least I'm certain that not a single person has ever seriously considered anything I've said and I don't blame them because not everyone is fit to be an advisor and yet no organization wants me when I offer them to do the most rudimentary tasks like mopping the floor? There's plenty of advantages of having me as I require no compensation for my labor, but that's not good enough either it seems.

In a way this is very good tho' because it means there must be plenty of eager recruits. So things should be going well enough.

Yeah the ultra-zionist libertarian nutjob. "Running" is not quite the correct word. Ruining would be more accurate.

They are currently $320 billion in debt, more than 50% of the population is in poverty, manufacturing and construction are collapsing amid rapid deindustrialization, social safety nets demolished, meanwhile their president is promoting crypto scams and going on trips to Washington and Tel Aviv to bow down and lick the boots of Trump and Zionist Hitler.

Javier Milei deepens Argentina’s IMF debt trap with ‘emergency’ $20 billion IMF loan

How libertarian Javier Milei is selling Argentina to Wall Street for $80 billion

Argentina’s Economic Activity Plunges to New Low Under Milei

I wouldn't say friends, they're just a bunch of ass kissers.

https://youtu.be/v5MOatu5-DE

I learned it in French first, so never had a problem pronouncing right, but I see a disturbing number of celebs and politicians pronuncing it "nucular" and I don't get it