When you think that you can hardly be surprised anymore, there's always something new
It's hilarious that articles are still needing to give a disclaimer after mentioning X that it refers to the site formerly known as Twitter.
If this isn't proof of a failed rebranding strategy, idk what is.
It's hilarious that articles are still needing to give a disclaimer after mentioning X that it refers to the site formerly known as Twitter.
If this isn't proof of a failed rebranding strategy, idk what is.