147
say the line, john (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Runcible@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago

Offensive as this is it might be less environmentally destructive than running an orchard in the desert. Not that responsible land stewardship is a possible outcome

[-] principalkohoutek@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Came here to say this. The central valley agriculture model is not the model we should be saving

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yep, and as much as I love the old orchards they are way more water intensive than the modern style, and unfortunately you can’t rip up irrigation once the trees are in. So, in a way, the first step to getting betting water use is tearing all this shit out.

All that aside, motherfucking capitalism decides to do it at a time when people might be needing food and jobs. Because it sucks at remembering the human angle.

[-] gnuthing@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Even with the newer drip irrigation systems that use less water, there is still not reliably enough water to support the kinds of farming they have

[-] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Also, peach trees only live like 8 years anyway, and get horrible diseases if you look at them funny.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
147 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14373 readers
642 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS