-9
Contamination fears after Ukraine loses British tank
(declassifieduk.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
-9 points (39.0% liked)
World News
33428 readers
438 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
wow it's a good thing that we care so much for our Ukrainian friends that we give them all sorts of weapons that are totally safe for them to use
Much safer than getting massacred by Russians.
Much more dangerous than negotiating a ceasefire.
With who? Russia? Lmao. Fuck that. Shoot them all and drive them back into that cesspool they call a county.
How many dead Ukrainians is Luhansk and Donetsk worth? How many dead Ukrainians is it worth to thrash against a multipolar world for another couple years? Fifty thousand? A hundred? Two? The price doesn't really matter to the beneficiaries, the beneficiaries aren't the ones to pay for it, but it's a good question to think about nonetheless. I personally want fewer dead Ukrainians, but you're entitled to your own feelings too.
I personally don't want to see Ukraine carved up like a turkey. Fuck off with your concern trolling.
Well, seeing at the beneficiaries are Ukraine, yes it would be worth it. I know you're either paid to believe or have been huffing the glue that is the reasoning posted on lemmygrad, hopefully you'll recover your morals or your senses one day.
edit: For reference to the glue sniffing
Safer than negotiating a ceasefire as a theory, maybe. Safer than negotiating a ceasefire with the RF? No.
Your one correct statement in this thread: Negotiating a peace with Russians is more dangerous than anything that happens in the war zone