The penalty [for LLM-hallucinated info] is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue. (twitter.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by who@feddit.org to c/science@mander.xyz

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://xcancel.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055

https://nitter.poast.org/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

[Justin Angel] My guess is that this policy will be applied selectively depending on institutional privilege and personal notoriety. It'll end up as a tool of silencing unconnected individuals vs. promoting better scientific discourse. // I aspire to be wrong.

Doesn't it sound weird that someone immediately assumes (i.e. makes up) the policy will be implemented unfairly, as soon it is announced? Well, if you check their profile, it doesn't:

Justin Angel // @JustinAngel // AI, iOS & Android dev. Worked at Meta, Uber, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft building apps, developer platforms, and hardware. Tweeting about LLM psychotherapy.

Plus almost all of their tweets are about LLMs. This stinks "competing interests" from a distance.

this post was submitted on 14 May 2026

94 points (96.1% liked)

Science

6938 readers

22 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz