This statement made a while back (to Fox news I think?) sat with me for quite a while because.....YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT NEGOTIATIONS, YOU'RE SAYING YOUR POWER TO THREATEN THEM IS DIMINISHED!
It's RIDICULOUS to me how they're phrasing this; why would the DPRK having nukes make negotiating with them harder? You're not talking about negotiating with them, you're talking about threatening them!
I hate metaphors for countries but this is like if you had a gang of armed people (who have and DO actually commit violence against unarmed people) saying this one guy they hate has become harder to negotiate with because he also just got a gun; you're not talking about negotiating with people, you're saying you can't threaten them anymore!
When they say "makes negotiations harder" they're saying it from the position of "getting what we want out of the negotiations is harder" rather than from a neutral position. It's strictly one sided, negotiations are a means towards the US advancing its position. Everything is always a different means of the US advancing its position, the US has never contemplated not trying to "win", not trying to create a monopoly out of the entire world. To capitalists countries are companies and the progression of companies is consolidation into monopoly. That's what the nato camp ultimately is, a consolidation of 32 previously independent countries into 1. It continues to "expand" because it is ultimately trying to consolidate the entire planet into a monopoly. This is just how everything works when everything you look at is a market.