387
submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 days ago

as soon as he’s not in control, there will be fuckery

This is what I don't think a lot of people will be prepared for ...

I dread if there's gonna some useless MBA coming around afterwards and saying some shit like: "why don't we charge steam users $9.99 to play their games per month?" and start cutting projects that benefit gamers to "save money" -- who needs Proton? who needs to invest in things like couch co-op? Then give themselves a shitload of money in exchange for all the goodwill that Valve have built up over the years.

[-] msage@programming.dev 25 points 2 days ago

But Valve is not a public company, so you don't get randos. Gabe is very aware of this fact himself.

[-] Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

Yeah, since Valve is not public the odds of the next head being an outside hire or some loud tech exec are extremely low.

GabeN is most likely to pick someone who's been around with the company since the early days, like Erik Johnson or Scott Lynch.

If he wants it to stay in the family, his own son Gray could take over, he's also a game dev.

Gabe has often expressed distrust of publicly traded markets, a plausible outcome is that his ownership gets converted into an employee-owned trust or a collective buyback, this would effectively permanently lock Valve into its current profile, distributing profils back into salaries and bonuses for the staff.

a plausible outcome is that his ownership gets converted into an employee-owned trust

That would be absolutely amazing if it happened. Plus, Valve would be able to hire damn near anyone they want due to the dividends the employees would get each year

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago
[-] msage@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

How would you want it to be certain?

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I think if it's in a contract or law ... I think most of us have just been burned by trusting "people".

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yep. This is how it goes downhill.

Some business analyst will make a pretty chart showing a massive revenue increase Vs some minor player attrition caused by the monthly subscription model, and the board will salivate at all those billions they're gonna get.

Is that revenue necessary? Not at all. But capitalism says you must maximise profits regardless for the sake of it, and without an all powerful overlord to say otherwise, it will be a tragic downfall.

[-] qaeta@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Oh no. Most of us are pretty much expecting the apocalypse whenever Gaben is gone.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I'm ready for it, I "backed up" my steam library because of it. The whole movement these last few months against steam make me think the industry is coordinating against it because steam won't play ball.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

I really hope Linux will get a bigger market share, thanks to Steam devices, before Steam has to change CEOs and starts the inevitable enshitification.

Because for Linux gaming, Steam's support for Proton is pretty much a monopol.

Most of 3rd party launchers for other stores also rely on Proton under the hood, IIRC.

[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Nobody stops EGS to implement Proton. Neither ActiBlizz, Ubisoft or EAs Origin.

The "monopoly" in this case is again just other stores not wanting to do what gamers want. Proton is FOSS and anyone can use it.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
387 points (96.2% liked)

PC Gaming

14782 readers
169 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS