472
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
472 points (98.2% liked)
Asklemmy
43965 readers
1256 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Nope. Even in a hypothetical world where all the ones guilty of a sufficiently severe crime and ONLY those go to prison, that doesn't make the world a safer place with less crime.
Punishment and the fear of same isn't anywhere near as powerful a motivator to stop breaking the law or deterrent as they've been telling you.
If it was, the US would be by far the safest with the least crime of all Western countries in stead of closer to the opposite.
what about locking up all the rich people and redistributing their wealth?
I'm wholeheartedly in favor of the latter, but the former wouldn't help.