-14

From the guy's own mouth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 40 points 1 year ago

There is only one country that used nukes against a live target, ever, and they did it twice, to civilian population centers in the middle of active peace negotiations.

There is only one country with nuclear capabilities deployed in over 80 countries under its direct control. There is only one country that has unilaterally pulled out of every nuclear treaty in history. There is only one country that publishes news articles about and has leadership in press conferences talking about winning nuclear war and about developing mini nukes. There is only one country working to undermine the MAD doctrine. There is only one country that just sent a nuclear-armed submarine to one its vassal states as a show of willingness.

[-] nicman24@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

ah yes because ww2 was a happy time for all and no other countries did anything compared to that. smart.

There is only one country that just sent a nuclear-armed submarine to one its vassal states as a show of willingness.

the russians literally lost so many nuclear subs in non native waters that the cia tried to grab one with a oversized arcade shop claw.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

No other country in the history of humanity dropped nukes outside of tests. No other country nukes civilians. No other country nukes civilians in a country that was surrendering. There is no way around it.

I'm not talking about the existence of subs in non-native waters. I'm talking about surfacing a sub and announcing it's presence in South Korea as a sabre rattle. Russia didn't surface subs off the coast of Florida, it didn't surface subs in a port in Mexico. Because Russia isn't trying to get in a war with the USA. It's the USA that keeps expanding its military presence every year, believing it has the mandate to establish a command center for each region of the planet, using slogans like "the border is everywhere" to organize it's border patrol, and expanding the presence of its nuclear capabilities into 80+ countries.

No, there is no comparison.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago

They dropped a bomb on a nation that was guilty of murdering up to 10m people. They were also not the initial aggressive beligerant. They do not have control with 80 nations, they have a non aggression pact. Yep, there are parts of the US media that is screwed up. That comes with free press. Does Russia have a free press? There is only one country that is looking to test out the mad doctrine, who also sent nuclear weapons to a vassal state: Russia.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

hitler-detector As always, the good and conscientious liberal is never more than two steps away from trying to justify the nuclear anihilation of two cities full of noncombatants in a country that was already surrendering. Incredible.

Next they will ignore this and continue to make things up about their state- designated "enemies" to make them sound worse. Sure, we may have lied about every war before this for profit but this time the Badguy Villainman really is Hitler 2.0, we swear! This time we really are on the right side of history, so shut up and support these Nazis!

God damn, I've lived in America all my life and I'm so sick of our bullshit, and I don't even have to worry about stepping on any of the unexploded freedom we leave everywhere else. And if you live in the UK or something, no you don't, it's Damp America, it's all America.

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahadeen fighters of Afghanistan

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago
[-] Syldon@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahadeen fighters of Afghanistan

And the brave women trying to get an education there.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

If the U.S. actually gave a shit about women's rights it wouldn't ally with Saudi Arabia (and a dozen other countries) and wouldn't have funded and armed fundamentalist Muslims throughout the 70s and 80s.

The U.S. view of human rights generally is that they are occasionally a useful rhetorical cudgel for browbeating skeptical liberals into supporting the war du jour.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Cannot argue against that. Much in the same way the EU bought Russian gas and oil after the invasion of Ukraine. Necessity is a burden sometimes.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

The adults in the room make hard descision get things done sweaty smuglord

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Incredible own goal here my man

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago
[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

The US created the people keeping women from getting an education

Youve got neutron star for brains

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

If the west allowed the Soviet Union to bring socialism to Afghanistan, the Mujahadeen would have been a footnote in the pages of history. If you agree with no other part of the USSR, the social and gender equality aspects are surely better than current Russia/Afghanistan. Instead we have Osama doing what he did

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

And the brave women trying to get an education there.

Damn, maybe America shouldn't have funded the fucking Mujahideen of Afghanistan to overthrow the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan who delivered to the women of Afghanistan their right to choose who to marry, where to work, right to education, and political rights.

Historically illiterate dipshit

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe if Russia/Stalin had not decided to annex half of Europe there would not have been a cold war. These people decided to sleep with the Russians. The enemy of your enemy is your friend.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
-14 points (45.8% liked)

World News

32352 readers
409 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS