266
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Rinna@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 150 points 1 year ago

Systemd apparently. Every time someone brings it up, the thread devolves into a religious flame war.

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've never got this either. I've been using Linux exclusively for over 4 years, multiple devices, tested dozens of distros, almost all Systemd-based and I havent ever experienced any problems that the anti-systemd folks talk about.

Or at least, they were so rare and minimal that I didn't notice.

Coming from an IT background dealing with 99% Windows machines and Microsoft products, maybe my bar was on the floor, but Linux has been soooo much more stable and dependable than Windows.

[-] Helix@feddit.de 42 points 1 year ago

Been using Linux since 2004 and systemd has made my life significantly easier. People bickering about systemd are usually ultra nerds without arguments real people would consider important.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I remember in my coding class when the prof claimed the language we were learning didn’t have GOTO, but it also didn’t need it because anything that could be accomplished with GOTO could be accomplished with loops and conditionals.

Now looking back I can’t believe what a tech debt nightmare goto is, and I’m glad I weaned off it.

Startup scripts seem more powerful because they’re code you know will be executed sequentially. For a developer that feels nice.

But a declarative system like systemd is so much more predictable and stable, specifically because it does NOT allow for sequential execution of code.

Once I made that switch I was a fan. It’s so much more predictable and standardized.

[-] Helix@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly my sentiment. Why would you want something with more moving parts than systemd which is also slower? :D

There are some good alternatives to SysV init.d scripts nowadays which only came to fruition after systemd existed and people noticed it's possible to write something like this.

I used OpenRC and s6 and both of them worked better and were easier to configure than SysV init.

[-] dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza 16 points 1 year ago

I agree. Coming from the Windows world, systemd felt quite familiar compared to other components in a typical linux system, I always liked it. It doesn't really follow the unix philosophy though, so it gets a lot of hate.

[-] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago

F*ck the Unix philosophy, this is Linux, not Unix.

[-] spauldo@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Ditching the UNIX philosophy is a bad idea.

It's a very useful guideline. There are times when those rules should be broken - systemd may be one of those - but by and large the UNIX philosophy has served us well.

fUcK sYsTeMd ItS fAsCiSt BuLlShIt If ThEAy PuT iT iN lInUx AnD tAkE oUr FrEeDoM i WiLl SwItCh To BsD uMmM IdK wHaT iT dOeS rEaLlY sOmEtHiNg WiTh SeRvIcEs I gUeSs FuCk SyStEmD!!11!!

[-] Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used Linux (and some Unix) before systemd was a thing and init scripts are jank. So much boilerplate and that was before things like proper isolation existed and other more modern features.

I don't understand why anyone would want that back.

A replacement of systemd with something else would be fine, but please no more init scripts and pointless run levels.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Upstart was fine. It does the parallel init thing without taking over the whole OS.

[-] Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I almost forgot it existed. It was a slight improvement, but with a whole bunch of new problems (most notable race conditions which were never fixed) and it was made obsolete by systemd.

It was a good evolutionary step only used by Ubuntu iirc. It was better at that time than the previous init system, but not more than that and it never found wide adaption.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah when systemd came out it was over a decade since I touched an init script. So the only difference to me was my computer booted up faster.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Was a little bit of a hassle initially to convert various custom init scripts into systemd unit files, but it was worth it IMO. Now the init scripts feel kinda jank in comparison lol.

On a barebones or embedded system I can see a lightweight init having a very big appeal though

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Systemd is awesome. I used to use init.d and was annoyed when I had to learn systemd instead, but once I did I’m so glad it exists. Declarative is the way to go.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
266 points (98.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44149 readers
1269 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS