1461
submitted 1 year ago by Cleverdawny@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aport@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago

Yes, people who burn food during a famine should be rehabilitated

And what of people who steal food during a famine, like the bolsheviks?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

People should steal food from hoarders to redistribute it to starving peasants actually.

If youre talking about grain quotas they stopped taking grain out of the region and started importing food when they realized there was a famine.

[-] aport@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

People should steal food from hoarders to redistribute it to starving peasants actually.

I agree, but the quota on kulak liquidation led to starving peasants being targeted.

If youre talking about grain quotas they stopped taking grain out of the region and started importing food when they realized there was a famine.

After millions of people had already starved to death. A minor but necessary bump in the road toward industrialization, I'm sure.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

After millions of people had already starved to death. A minor but necessary bump in the road toward industrialization, I’m sure.

It wasn't necessary. They could have foreseen the need for an independent commission to verify the numbers that local officials were reporting. They could have cracked down harder on sabotage of planting and harvesting and the mass slaughter of livestock by kulaks.

Industrialization was necessary. If they didn't push hard for industrialization we might all be speaking German right now. They cut it close to the wire and the mistakes that they made resulted in mass suffering. But there were no more famines with the exception of post ww2 after that famine, in an area that previously frequently had famines, because collectivization worked once the kinks were worked out.

[-] aport@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Rapid industrialization at the cost of millions of lives was only a necessity because Stalin insisted on Socialism in One Country.

Had proletariat revolutions not failed elsewhere, especially Western Europe, there would be no need for such a haphazard and reckless transition.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Okay but how was the soviet union to create a global proletarian revolution? They had to work with what they had.

[-] aport@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You could ask Trotsky but Stalin had him murdered 🤷

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I've read Trot stuff and found their arguments unconvincing in this context. Global proletarian revolution is something we all have to exercise agency over, if youre in the soviet union you can't just rely on everyone else spontaneously uprising, you have to plan for that not happening. And it didn't happen, so...

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, it's so fucked up that Stalin stole all those poor Kulaks' grain and put it in a big swimming pool so that he and his cabinet could swim around in it like Scrooge McDuck.

[-] aport@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Are there Kulaks in the room with you right now?

The soviets took enough grain from Ukrainian peasants to induce widespread hunger and death. But let's blame 1% of the peasantry who had already liquidated as a class.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
1461 points (93.3% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1684 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS