27
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
27 points (70.8% liked)
World News
32352 readers
865 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The NY Times gave up their sources in Russia to the Russian government. No reason to assume this isn't a pro-Russian story masquerading as news.
How the hell you people landed on this level of paranoia.
Just read an article from a credible source back when Russia first invaded. No paranoia here. Didn't care about them before, still don't. They have always been a biased source.
This article has been pretty much completely pro Ukraine, just as NYT consistently is, it just call it "a mistake". You believe Ukrainian army and their equipment is completely infallible? Look like a paranoic reflex of throwing heavy accusations on a slightest breach of your worldview.
Not at all. I just prefer journalistic integrity from my news sources. If you'd like to project your own opinions, because my reasoning doesn't sit well with you, perhaps you should reflect on your own issues. They endangered Russians that trusted them with information about what was happening there after the invasion. People who were not pro-war.
Whaaaat the fuck
The video is public and so is the orientation of the camera. The missile came from the direction of Ukraine. If Russia has the capability of sending missiles that can literally pull a 180 degree midair turn, do you really think they'd use that on a market?