66
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Kavaratzis should not be liable.

If the original cheque is ever found, and someone else attempts to cash it, that would be fraud. Now that Kavaratzis has requested a new cheque, if the old one ever makes it to their possession and they attempt to cash it, that would also be fraud. We figured this out DECADES ago, that's why cheques have a holding period.

Whoever is cashing the cheque is responsible to make sure it clears before exchanging it for money, and the original cheque should be annulled so it cannot be cashed.

[-] Fifteen_Two@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I do not understand why this is an issue at all.

[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

I do not understand why this is an issue at all.

TD having to do their job is the issue.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 year ago

Right, this check is not a bearer bond, its made out to a singular person. There shouldn't be any issue here. It's not 1850 where it takes weeks to verify a check

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Nope, it's 2023, where people seem to have forgotten how cheques work.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
66 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
460 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS