Alberta deserves more than half CPP assets if it exits program: report (calgary.ctvnews.ca)

submitted 2 years ago by sik0fewl@kbin.social to c/canada@lemmy.ca

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A report commissioned by the Alberta government says the province would be entitled to more than half the assets of the Canada Pension Plan - $334 billion - if it were to exit the national retirement savings program in 2027.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is no change in hands in what you describe. It would still be the same public asset, even if the public saw its transformation into something new.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Who owns it doesn't matter. What matters is that it isn't paved or developed. Pavement and digging basements reduce the land's ability to absorb water, which can cause flooding and reduce groundwater availability in surrounding areas.

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Who owns it does matter when talking about privatization. Your definition of a public asset has no way to transfer ownership. It will forever and always be a public asset.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

It's only a public asset as long as it's untouched (i.e. not paved or developed). The Greenbelt laws keep it that way.

Think of the Rocky Mountains as a public asset. I don't know who owns them, but that doesn't matter. They are a public asset as long as they exist, but if someone is allowed to flatten them, or carve the faces of dead prime ministers into them, they are no longer an asset to the public. Both of those are much more difficult to do than it is to build a house or a parking lot, so I'm not terribly worried about that scenario unfolding, but it's the same idea, just bigger.