229
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
229 points (98.7% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26997 readers
963 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
All hands meeting … “show of hands, who's been here less than a year?”…”you're all top notch, the best candidates from the best schools… we couldn't get that caliber employee years ago!” [suggesting those who built the business to that level were what, inferior - including the VP that just said it?]
It was meant as a compliment to the new folks…but it fell FLAT.
I could see that as a compliment? Like the existing team was so good that together they reached recognition they didn't previously have?
I think it should be the goal of every organization that the next hire always be better than the last. They should get there by making sure that they train and build up every previous hire to be better than they were and making their teams be attractive to higher caliber recruits. A business really doing well should elevate all the employees - wages, skills, lifestyle - and that is what lets them hire well. But boy is it hard to communicate that scheme in two sentences at an all-hands pep talk.
As a wage slave, even spelled out like that it doesn't sound great to me. I don't care about how impressive the company is beyond it's ability to pay me. "Hey, you did a good job of making my company look good enough to hire people better than you." I'm not sure exactly how to put my discomfort with it into words, but being told I did a good job of improving the company's image just feels like a pat on the head and a "good boy." My goal here isn't to help you, it's to get you to give me money. Compliment me with a raise, not telling me how much more money you're making because of me. Bragging to employees about quarterly profits only actually cheers up the ones who drink the company koolaid at every job they ever work at. For the rest of us it means that we won't be out of a job because the company went under. I got an extra 2 hundred dollars from my salary this year from that and the guy announcing it got a hundred thousand dollar bonus. Great.
That's what makes the communication so difficult to do well - when the boss comes in and says "We're doing great," the workers all assume he means corporate profits, but corporate profits don't attract good workers. Salary, benefits, and working conditions do. If the boss wants to make that point at a pep talk, he's got to go on a long tangent about how competitive salaries are, how much vacation everyone gets, yada yada, and by the end of that, saying "and we can hire really good entry-level workers," is kind of anticlimactic. I mean, who cares if this year's new hires graduated with median 3.2 GPA vs just 3.0 5 years ago? Better just not to phrase it that way, even if it is a positive metric for both new and established workers.