245
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Alien life may not be carbon-based, new study suggests::Self-sustaining chemical reactions that could support biology radically different from life as we know it might exist on many different planets, a new study finds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 110 points 1 year ago

2 questions:

Can we eat non-carbon based life forms?

Can we fuck non-carbon based life forms?

[-] NAXLAB@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. You can eat them if they have the nutrients you need. Non-carbon-based just means it won't use carbon as the foundation of its molecular and cellular workings. By mass, there's relatively little carbon in living organisms and on earth, so whatever's out there could still use carbon and other elements enough that it has something we could eat. There's barely any telling what kinds of chemicals will be found in an organism like that, but it could easily be a mix of things we can digest and things we can't. Even carbon-based life is like that. Wood for example is biologically very similar to us, but is mainly made of cellulose, which we can't really digest at all.

  2. yes, if it fits.

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

By mass, there's relatively little carbon in living organisms and on earth

Some quick googling tells me about 60% of our body is water, and of what is left, almost half is carbon. This would include all of the fats, carbohydrates and sugars that we need for energy.

If you ate a non-carbon based lifeform, you might get some water or iron and other minerals you need a little of in your diet, but the reason we need to eat so much is to ingest different forms of carbon to digest.

An alien that died on earth would probably not even rot because our food chain is so dependent on our proteins.

[-] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

An alien that died on earth would probably not even rot because our food chain is so dependent on our proteins.

That is a super interesting idea. Presumably it would bring it's own bacteria though?

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Bacteria that breaks down life forms might not be necessary for life. The ancient Forrest's that became oil deposits didn't have bacteria to break them down. This caused them to become oil. It's why there won't be any new oil (naturally occuring).

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 31 points 1 year ago

We can probably do it once, but we might have to choose one or the other.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Both of these are matters of will.

[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nah it'll be something with a thorax that breeds like a mantis.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

1st question: no.

2nd question... Depends how horny and desperate you are.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Both of those questions will depend on what kind of environment they need to survive. They might need pressures higher than we can or a pH that would be corrosive to us, or exposure to an chemical that is toxic to us like oxygen was to most life that was around when photosynthesis started producing it.

If we can make physical contact with it, we'll be able to eat it. But if it is based on a different chemistry, I doubt there will be much nutritional value for us as our proteins and vitamins are all based on our chemistry. Hell, there's a good chance we won't get much nutrition from alien life based on the same chemistry because they might have evolved with a completely different set of proteins that might do things similarly but connect with each other a bit differently. There's a symmetrical set of proteins that look like mirror images of ours and would behave exactly the same, but aren't compatible with ours.

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Opposite sugar would be the best "sugar free"/zero calorie alternative. If we had some alien vegetation that grew this. Obesity, diabetes and tooth decay would be a thing of the past. Real sugar, completely indigestible to humans.

[-] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We can all ready do that L glucose tastes like sugar (D glucose) but can not be broken down

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If it even binds to our taste receptors.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
245 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

60101 readers
2269 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS