41
How to store backups?
(monero.town)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
41 points (97.7% liked)
Selfhosted
40359 readers
389 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yes, storing each backup in 2+ places is best.
You can of course automate it. If you're running backups from Linux use
anacronrather thancronbecauseanacrontries to run when it can (when the machine turns on), whereascrondoesn't run again if the machine was off when it was time to run.rsyncis the most straightfoward solution. Pros: it won't copy files again if they haven't changed; it can copy remotely over ssh. Con: it has a bit of a learning curve.BorgBackup would be my next recommendation, it takes distinct backups but doesn't duplicate files between them. It has compression, encryption (optional) and you can run checks on the backups. Con: for remote use you need to run a borg server on the target machine. Another potential con is that it doesn't store the files in a directly usable format like rsync. Borg archives are similar to a zip archive – you can list the files, you can extract them, you can even mount them somewhere and then access the files directly – but you can't access them directly without borg.