148
submitted 1 year ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EveningNewbs@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

The suggestion here is that the type of game that can thrive on a subscription service is either a small one that benefits from better curation and visibility or a live-service one that can make up revenue on the backend by charging all the new players microtransactions (the new store shelves are inside the games themselves).

I've been saying this since Game Pass launched: it encourages scummy monetization. The kind of games that come to it are going to have more and more content locked away behind microtransactions to make up the money lost by not selling copies. It's going to gradually become full of "free" to play garbage, and people will accept it because they didn't pay for an individual game outright.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Of the two options that Phil says Game Pass encourages (and I agree with his analysis), one is the opposite of scummy and something the market could use more of.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
148 points (95.1% liked)

Gaming

20015 readers
637 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS