32
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)
Selfhosted
39677 readers
472 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Take a look at NextCloud - very easy to host and has great user management and sharing.
There are also a good amount of apps that are one click integration if you need to expand on functionality.
Thanks! I already use NextCloud and quite like it! Hover, I find their file upload feature to be lacking for this use-case. Sadly, it crashes/freezes the browser when I try to upload a folder with a lot of files (which is the main thing I'll need to do with this)
Maybe install the nextcloud client on his PC and have him copy over the files there. The Nextcloud client has sync and resume functionality and you don't have to watch it like a hawk. It just does it's thing in the background.
Huh yeah that's not a bad idea. I actually sort of dislike the nextcloud client normally (as I'd prefer it to not actually download the remote files, but act like a virtual filesystem). But in this case, it might actually work...
It acts as a virtual file system on Windows.
Oh, didn’t know that. Sadly I’m only on Mac & Linux
I believe it is able to do so on Windows because it uses the same system that OneDrive does, and is baked in to the OS. Not sure what the excuses are on MacOS and Linux.
But if you're using Dolphin or Nautilus on Linux, does setting up a WebDAV network location not meet your needs?
That would work fine for linux, but the folks who need to upload stuff to me server can't do that. They're running Macos which doesn't really support webdav well (and SMB is a mess too), plus they're on an external network and I don't want to have to get them on my VPN
If you’re doing the uploads yourself, the fastest solution for large files (e.g. compress into a tar/7z) will be rsync.
It requires minimal setup (ssh or vpn connection) and uses chunk transfer which is typically faster and can be resumed in event of connection failures
I love rsync, and also have been using croc a lot recently for similar stuff. It's not really feasible for non-technical users who don't even want to think about using a terminal though.
browser-based 'clients' with large directories and large numbers of files in a single multi-file upload are going to choke. you need binary bits on the parents' end, such as a dedicated backup or sync utility.
if you could populate your server with their existing files using a physical drive, that would be better, and perhaps faster and easier, too--then a browser-based upload solution could probably handle the much smaller 'updates' of new stuff. have them consolidate all the existing files on one external (plus also on a second for a local backup). hell, you could do that bit via remote desktop and all they'd need to do is connect the drives and let you in. then somehow get one of those drives to you (ship, deliver, you pick up. whatever is feasible).