61
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
61 points (91.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43728 readers
1463 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
You can hide posts - I believe. There’s a setting in your Lemmy profile to hide read posts. It’s a server side setting so it’ll propagate to any apps. I believe some apps also have their own local “hide post” feature.
Note that the Lemmy profile setting is pretty generous when it comes considering what’s read and what isn’t, but in general it works.
I suggest browsing New, the experience is 100% better.
I believe multi communities have been suggested before. Not sure if there’s an issue for it on GitHub yet.
I did not know this and have been here since before the reddit migration!! Thanks!!!
Not totally sure I understand. I don't use apps, but browser, and don't see any such setting in my profile toggles.
(It’s in settings)
Actually it turned out to be a disaster. Unfortunately, the option in question has no discretion, and will hide posts from the overview of any instance at all. For example, I recently became unable to view posts in my own instance, and struggled for days trying to figure out what the issue was. Finally I thought back to this convo, reversed the setting, and now the problem is solved.
Therefore, when the Lemmy code is able to tag individual posts & comments as hidden, I reckon they ought to kill that option in user settings, as it can cause way more trouble than its worth IME.
@maegul@lemmy.ml
I'm not sure I understand what happened to you.
By this do you mean that a post is considered
Readand thereforeHiddenwhenever any one person has read the post?Well, not any one /random/ person, but you, the user! I.e., right now, it all depends on what posts YOU clicked on yourself. (if you clicked on them even once, now they're forever disappeared under that particular setting, see)
Now, this might be helpful when browsing a feed or stream, but when it comes to looking at single instances, can be very *unhelpful*.
For example (as said above)-- I have a tiny community (mostly of my own work), and because of that setting, can't even see what the posts are, now.
That is-- unless I turn the setting OFF, I can see *zero* content in my very own community, i.e. the one that I started. And of course, it messes up other instances which are merely in my 'favorite' streams. When I browse to them specifically in order to see what their latest content is, anything I viewed before then is now "missing."
It winds up being a terrible feature unless you purely view by stream, in other words.
@oatmilkmaid@evistre@possumpat.io
Yeah, like I said the Lemmy setting is ridiculously generous with what it considers read and how it hides things. Best way to circumvent this is just to use an app that’s has the option to hide read posts in-app and doesn’t use the Lemmy settings. I think Voyager (formerly wefwef) does it, maybe Memmy? Not sure about the Android applications. Connect probably
I hit the FV with Chrome/FF, so I guess I'm out of luck with that. Still, hiding content is such a powerful feature that I reckon it will be implemented soon enough.
It certainly wouldn't hurt if the RES devs got busy on Lemmy.
Thanks for that. I was an idiot, fixating on the word "hide" for some reason.