310
The End of Trump Inc.
(www.theatlantic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
310 points (95.6% liked)
politics
18883 readers
3592 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The sad thing is that if he hadn't drawn the spotlight on the org by getting elected and refusing to divest himself, he would likely still be getting away with it.
Makes you wonder how many people are quietly getting away with it now.
Anyone who has a B in their net worth.
What if my net worth is Broke?
TIL
Quite a lot. David Cay Johnston has a couple of good books on the subject:
Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich--and Cheat Everybody Else
https://a.co/d/ezlWPM9
Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill)
https://a.co/d/8M5E4Es
The Fine Print: How Big Companies Use "Plain English" to Rob You Blind
https://a.co/d/hKGxR9Q
There's a reason Republicans are hell bent on defending the IRS and the only other option isn't putting up much of a fight...
Democrats just increased funding for the IRS. So, yeah they are.
Not going to look up the actual numbers, but...
Dems said we need X billions dollars to fund the IRS.
Dems asked for billions less, got even less passed. Then went back and took billions more from that after it was passed as a "show of good faith" in negations with Republicans. I'm pretty fucking sure that was to get a budget passed, which Surprise! Republicans still didn't pass one.
That's why I said "the only other option isn’t putting up much of a fight…".
By Dems own admission we're not giving them enough, even before it was reduced multiple times.
They already increased it last year and are asking for more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/08/06/inflation-reduction-act-irs/
I.... I just explained all that to you...
https://fortune.com/2023/09/07/internal-revenue-service-60-billion-irs-technology-ai/
That's from this month, notice how my link says 60 billion, and yours says 80 billion?
We'll simplify, just ignore the billion part, and the zero as well:
Which number is bigger, 6 or 8?
Don't want to go over your head, but we can reduce by a factor of two as well, 3 and 4. That's a 25% decrease in funding since your article...
I would happily take that timeline over the current one