498
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

No way Trump gets on that stand.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago

James plans to call Trump and his adult sons to the stand during the trial, according to a list of witnesses the AG has filed with the court.

You get called to the stand, you go on the stand.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Almost no one bothers because nearly everyone would plead the fifth. It's expected in court as the defendant.

I guess they're banking on Trump being that self important.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 79 points 1 year ago

Fifth or not, if he gets called to the stand, he goes on it. Then he gets to sit there and make his own decisions, under oath, about how to respond to questions.

In a criminal case, "jurors cannot get information about a defendant's refusal to answer questions or go on the witness stand in their defense." But this is a civil case. "The protections you have in criminal prosecutions when taking the fifth do not apply in a civil case. A jury [or the judge, in this case] is free to make an adverse inference if you plead the fifth in a civil trial."

Call him up.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

And I believe things that come to light as a result can lead to further civil and criminal charges?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Oh of course - that would be the case whether it was civil or criminal. New information comes to light that reveals additional crimes or liabilities, AG would need to look at whether those are prosecutable.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I’m sure that every insurance company, bank, and business that he defrauded using these fraudulent claims is going to want go after him.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

There's only one bank that will do business with him as it is....

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I did Nazi that coming

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This trial will have no jurors. It’s just the lawyers, the Trumps, a few related parties, and the judge.

Edit: I tried to find a source, but I’m on mobile, however I read it in one of the previous articles discussing this.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

That doesn't change the nature of the Fifth Amendment in relation to a civil case. When it is a bench trial, the judge is the juror.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh, I know. however, the judge is far less likely to be swayed by the Trump’s “Trumpiness” than even your average New York juror given their previous rulings in the case and their complete lack of patience with their lawyers’ arguments thus far.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 year ago
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

lol, as I said, I’m on mobile. oops!

fixed now

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

All they have to do is put him on the stand and say something like “the libs say you’re the worst at dodging taxes, that you pay so much tax you practically give it away to poor people” to which he’d go on a 17 minute tirade about how he doges taxes bigger than anyone in the world and it’s all political and ok to do because he very smart man.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Just ask him who has the best golf courses, the most luxurious, the most valuable. Or maybe who's the best at avoiding taxes...

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The 5th works differently in a civil trial in a really important way. In a civil case the jury is allowed to assume he's guilty when he pleads the 5th.

The prosecution could say something like "Wow. You are pleading the 5th to A LOT of these questions. That looks really bad. Undoubtedly you know this. Yet you seem to have determined that providing an answer would be even worse for you."

Or something like that. I'm not a lawyer.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wish all proceedings like this were recorded.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
498 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19103 readers
2823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS