233
Amazing (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] D3FNC@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

I don't really agree with that, ideally they shouldn't even have access to any firearms at all. Some forms of peace officers historically never carried arms.

Especially for people who grew up around violence just an officer near you wearing a gun ratchets the stakes up considerably. Then of course they always want to take it out, wave it around and proceed to violate every single element of firearm safety like a sick form of bingo.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Disagree with what? You're talking about how you think things should be, i'm talking about what their actual job actually is. They exist as enforcers for capital, and a lot of them are bad at it.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
233 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13878 readers
789 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS