366

A band of House conservatives Friday voted down a GOP bill to avoid a government shutdown. The vote marked a significant — and embarrassing — defeat for Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) …

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 125 points 1 year ago

I'm 100% positive that even if it included billions for a wall, being able to shoot migrants, and free teens for Geatz to rape it still would have been voted down. They want this shutdown.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

Which is incredibly dumb.

Setting aside the damage to the economy and just looking at the politics of it:

  • "Republicans hate our troops" is an easy attack. Enlisted service members tend to lean right, and stopping their pay (while still requiring them to work) is going to be a bad look. And all the Dems have to say is "hey look at what the Repubs did to our men and women in uniform." Easy win.

  • It's obvious that the Republicans are at fault for the shutdown. And it's obvious that they're not going to get anywhere. They don't have the votes. When we come out of this with a stupid temporary budget, the Repubs will have won nothing and will look even more incompetent.

  • It gives the Dems easy talking points, while being difficult to defend by the Repubs. Anyone but Trump would get wrecked in a debate with Biden over this. (Trump never says anything coherent, and no one expects him to, which is a huge benefit in a debate. You simply can't debate him effectively.)

Republicans are shooting themselves in the feet, and it's going to bite them in the ass in the general. It just sucks that this will have lasting repercussions on the economy and the strength of the dollar worldwide...

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 year ago

Republican base voters happily died of covid asphyxiation in the tens of thousands during Trump's administration. They do not know, they do not care.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago

They want this shutdown.

Those 20, and likely a few more, really do. It's insanity.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

I think the fact the Trump is pretty close to the biblical definition of the antichrist is very attractive to a certain percentage of these ding-dongs. They feel they're doing God's work bringing about the end of days.

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

That's what I mean, 20% of Americans see that and say "Hallelujah! He's comin' round the mountain!!"

They think if the world ends that means Jesus will show up.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think McCarthy and the more moderate ones don't, they've been saying repeatedly that Republicans get the blame for shutdowns. Their far right caucus though is a bunch of fucking idiots and true believers.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 12 points 1 year ago

I think McCarthy and the more moderate ones don’t

They clearly don't. They are obviously frustrated AF with their "colleagues" because they are increasingly calling them out publicly and by name which is something that I don't recall happening before. There's about 20ish clowns in the HoR that simply aren't going to be happy unless they manage to burn it all down.

[-] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

McCarthy and his "moderates" could pass the budget (that he already agreed to) with Democratic support.

The only reason he isn't is because he would lose his speakership.

This is down to one person not willing make the sacrifice in order to prevent millions of people from suffering.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They want a shutdown, and they want a recession. Recessions are great for the 1%.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
366 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS