388
submitted 1 year ago by elvith@feddit.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta plans to move to a "Pay for your Rights" model, where EU users will have to pay $ 168 a year (€ 160 a year) if they don't agree to give up their fundamental right to privacy on platforms such as Instagram and Facebook. History has shown that Meta's regulator, the Irish DPC, is likely to agree to any way that Meta can bypass the GDPR. However, the company may also be able to use six words from a recent Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling to support its approach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

Anyone with more than a single brain cell should move to federated/decentralized platforms with a "Don't pay but still have more rights than a Facebook user" approach

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

network effect – easy when it’s just you – but then you need to convince all your friends and family to switch over as well – and they’re not interested because it would mean convincing all their friends and family too … best you can hope for is a trust thermocline, a catastrophic event that’s more likely to leave millions of Facebook users floundering in anger than in curiosity at alternatives …

[-] settinmoon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The approach I took is organize my contacts into three categories The people that I talk to on a daily basis, people that I occasionally talk to, and people who I rarely ever talk to. For the first group (less than 10 for me), mostly close friends and families, I just bullied them to use an alternative platform like Signal until they caved in. For the second group, I recommend Signal to them but also left them with my phone number so they can text me if needed. For the third group I did nothing. Then I proceeded to delete FB Messenger off all my devices. I still log in to the web version maybe once per month to check if anyone from the third group needs to reach me or if there's any group events going on. I did not fully get off FB but I ended up reducing 99% of my usage and 100% of the garbage in app and location tracking. To me this is good enough

[-] TxTechnician@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Hmm, never thought of that. I guess the reddit api fiasco was a catastrophic event.

[-] bdkmshr 3 points 1 year ago

Well it is easy for me as i dont have friend.....

[-] Emprx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Why use a social network at all, then? /s

[-] bdkmshr 1 points 1 year ago

I like the drama

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Dude you'd be surprised the amount of dumb mofos walking around you. I am 100% sure there will be some losers willing to pay that amount to use Facebook.

[-] nosnahc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's not about the price, nobody will pay. People who use Meta doesn't care about privacy. They will just click "accept for free" and that's it...

It's a way to force people to accept theire conditions even if the law force them to give us the choice.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
388 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
346 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS