71
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

In short: By the time a person is 18, they must effectively be able to communicate and understand conversationally in 2 languages and casually use them in daily life..., if not become completely fluent...

Other than that, any language goes (whether it is a locally-known one, or a popular one worldwide),

The only thing I hope to gain from this, is to rid the world of /Monolingual Betas/

Seriously though, has this been a policy before? Because I haven't heard of such one...

I think this can especially be used for citizenship...

Edit: I don't necessarily have any other presupposed requirements besides bilingualism, though we may have certain notions of such in this main goal

Edit II: In furthering this venture, I have realized that my liberalism may slightly poisoned my lens....

And for clarification...

Minimum dual language system:

Main national language + other language (likely another related language, but foreign ones are fine)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Othello@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

i think you should HAVE to learn sign language.

[-] raven@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

It would be so handy to communicate with someone from the other side of a window or something too

I expect everyone would develop a habit of signing some things while talking, to emphasize a point or provide context.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

Ogey then... which sign language? American?

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

they should learn their respective countries. I assume dialects like Black American Sign Language would be preserved through social learning. although a universal sign language could be cool. i think we should learn sign language because deaf people cant learn how to hear.

[-] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And where does this slope end? We all have to learn how to speak to neurodivergent people in an inclusive way because neurotipical communication can lead to misunderstanding??? yes-hahaha-yes-r sicko-yes

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

whats next? radically changing our society to address the needs of the most needy first? CRAZZZZZZY

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Why? I’m thinking in terms of what I would use as a language in my every day in the United States and there are so many languages I hear more often per day than see people signing

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

In the post-atomic horror of the near future you will need sign language to signal your comrades while you engage in urban stealth combat against the techno-barbarians of the rad wastes

[-] Sandinband@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

To communicate with deaf or hard of hearing people, to communicate with someone when you both can't hear eachother, to commicate with infants, to committed with non verbal people, etc but just communicating with disabled people should be a good enough reason

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago

But why this over a language with more monolingual/ non-dominant language speakers within the country? You can’t communicate with them either unless you know their language

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
747 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS