146
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

From what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

brump Blue MAGA logic right there Jack

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Even if it was a contractual thing, it would've been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly what's so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
756 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS