146
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago

From what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

brump Blue MAGA logic right there Jack

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Even if it was a contractual thing, it would've been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Exactly what's so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13940 readers
819 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS