524

God help them. The slaughter to come is probably beyond our imagining

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 94 points 2 years ago

I don't like Hamas but it's entirely the Zionists fault that this organisation exists. They forced Palestinians into subhuman conditions which led to people Embracing religious extremism with a mix of national resistance.

[-] star_wraith@hexbear.net 125 points 2 years ago

Israel and the U.S. also empowered Hamas in the 80s because they didn’t want the secular leftist PLO gaining any more traction

[-] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 88 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah they were literally funneling money to the founder of Hamas, this is textbook blowback.

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 59 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It was an entire thing. Undermine the PLO by by making them agree to utopian plans of which Israel has no intention of upholding on their side, support Hamas in turn so that they win the election. Use this a pretext to justify unconditional support for the Israeli project.

[-] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 69 points 2 years ago

Don't forget the sidelining of the PFLP as well, the only thing that scares them more than a liberated Palestine is a Marxist liberated Palestine.

[-] Des@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago

fuck we are getting a blowback season from this aren't we?

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago

Oh how they loved to shit all over Yasir Arafat

[-] KittyBobo@hexbear.net 42 points 2 years ago

I will be ecstatic when we're in a position where we're talking shit about the single state of Palestine's government.

[-] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Embracing religious extremism

Don't forget that it's also that Isn'trael focused on repressing the marxists in particular as well

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

https://monthlyreview.org/2007/12/01/political-islam-in-the-service-of-imperialism/

It is, thus, easy to understand the initiative taken by the United States to break the united front of Asian and African states set up at Bandung (1955) by creating an “Islamic Conference,” immediately promoted (from 1957) by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Political Islam penetrated into the region by this means.

The least of the conclusions that should be drawn from the observations made here is that political Islam is not the spontaneous result of the assertion of authentic religious convictions by the peoples concerned. Political Islam was constructed by the systematic action of imperialism, supported, of course, by obscurantist reactionary forces and subservient comprador classes. That this state of affairs is also the responsibility of left forces that neither saw nor knew how to deal with the challenge remains indisputable.

Today more than ever, in conjunction with the implementation of the U.S. “Greater Middle East project,” the rights of the Palestinian people have been abolished. All the same, the PLO accepted the Oslo and Madrid plans and the roadmap drafted by Washington. It is Israel that has openly gone back on its agreement, and implemented an even more ambitious expansion plan. The PLO has been undermined as a result: public opinion can justly reproach it with having naively believed in the sincerity of its adversaries. The support provided by the occupation authorities to its Islamist adversary (Hamas), in the beginning, at least, and the spread of corrupt practices in the Palestinian administration (on which the fund donors—the World Bank, Europe, and the NGOs—are silent, if they are not party to it) had to lead to the Hamas electoral victory (it was predictable). This then became an additional pretext immediately put forward to justify unconditional alignment with Israeli policies no matter what they may be.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
524 points (100.0% liked)

news

24540 readers
589 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS